Mark Zuckerberg and Sheryl Sandberg need you to know they’re nonetheless mates and undoubtedly not mad at one another

On Thursday, The New York Occasions revealed a lengthy story in regards to the rise in energy of Stephen Miller, a longtime loyalist of Donald Trump recognized for his hardline views on immigration. Usually, a narrative like that wouldn’t get a lot consideration within the tech press. However the piece opened with an anecdote about Mark Zuckerberg that instantly raised eyebrows.

The story detailed a latest assembly Miller had with Zuckerberg when the Meta CEO traveled to Mar-a-Lago final yr. In keeping with The Occasions, Zuckerberg — who would quickly resign Meta’s prior fact checking efforts and ditch corporate diversity packages — “blamed his former chief working officer, Sheryl Sandberg, for an inclusivity initiative at Fb that inspired workers’ self-expression within the office.”

That line set off a contemporary spherical of hypothesis (and a few outrage) in tech circles. Sandberg, who left Meta in 2022 and rose to fame after authoring her ladies within the office manifesto Lean In, was recognized for her as soon as shut partnership with Zuckerberg on the high of Fb. That Zuckerberg would blame his former high lieutenant for fostering “inclusivity” at his firm, raised eyebrows even amongst longtime observers of the corporate.

“She at all times knew who Mark Zuckerberg and lined for him,” New York Occasions reporter Sheera Frankel, who co-wrote a e-book about Fb’s dominance, noticed on Bluesky. “ The query is whether or not she is going to proceed to take action when he so blatantly throws her underneath the (Trump) bus.” Journalist and longtime tech pundit Kara Swisher likewise noted that “of us I talked to tonight from the Mark/Sheryl Fb period are shocked however not stunned by his blaming her.”

I additionally weighed in on my Threads account, sharing a hyperlink to a Enterprise Insider story from February that quoted an interview wherein Zuckerberg stated that Sandberg had raised him “like a father or mother.” I joked that the remark hadn’t aged properly.

However on Friday, Zuckerberg determined to let me (and I assume everybody else) know that he and Sandberg are nonetheless cool, in any case. “Sheryl did superb work at Meta and can eternally be a legend within the trade,” he wrote in a reply to my put up. “She constructed one of many best companies of all time and taught me a lot of what I do know.”

A couple of minutes later, Sandberg jumped in to helpfully let me know there aren’t any laborious emotions on her aspect, both. “Thanks, @zuck. I’ll at all times be pleased about the various years we spent constructing an excellent enterprise collectively – and to your friendship that bought me via a few of the hardest occasions of my life and continues to at the present time.”

Zuckerberg responded with a single heart emoji.

I requested Zuckerberg if he felt Sandberg was too centered on DEI initiatives at Meta, or whether or not she took away from the “masculine power” he lately told Joe Rogan firms ought to embody. Notably, he has not denied The Occasions’ reporting about his feedback relating to Sandberg, although he claimed they’re being misconstrued.

“I answered a query about the place the phrase ‘carry your complete self to work’ got here from, and now there’s an entire bogus narrative saying I blamed Sheryl for a bunch of stuff that I by no means did and by no means will,” he said. (Bringing your “complete self” to work is a slogan popularized by Sandberg in Lean In. Comparable language typically appeared on Meta’s careers site when the corporate highlighted variety amongst its workers. “Being your genuine self is the muse of who we’re as an organization,” Meta wrote on a since-deleted web page of its company web site the place it shared its inner variety reviews.)

So, I assume that settles it. Nothing to see right here, of us. Mark and Sheryl are undoubtedly nonetheless mates. They might not work on the similar firm anymore, however they’re nonetheless in a position to come collectively to go off a possible PR crisis. What could possibly be extra inspiring than that?

Replace, January 17, 2025, 4PM PT: This put up was up to date to mirror a further remark from Zuckerberg.